CougarCJ
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2006
- Messages
- 2,217
I remember another fuel tank issue
Paul, I previously owned two Chevrolet trucks 1976 and 1985. Same deal with the side tanks outside of the frame. Same expose by CBS?. As I recall on the Chevrolet trucks CBS was found out to have 'rigged' the outcome of the crash testing. I know that there were instances of fatalities, but CBS was unable to duplicate the outcome without a staged and rigged fuel tank crash test. This goes back before 1999 though.
Like a hushed family secret, I wanted to bring this topic out into the open. This is why I brought up the subject.
Here are two websites I think that everyone should first get a close look at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/05/17/60II/main47539.shtml
and...
http://www.autosafety.org/article.php?scid=96&did=478
What I hope to do is educate and make everyone aware of the POTENTIAL of what can happen with our gas tanks in a severe accident. I don't mean to be alarmist, or pass judgement, or "go after" Ford on this--but to just direct you to this information. Many '68 GT/CS cars have passed hands since 1999, and new owners may not know about this topic.
When this first surfaced in 1999, there were letters to Mustang Monthly saying how the media was 'hyping" this, and My response was that there was some "denial" in regards to the problem.
But--regardless of what lies between the "truth"; lawyers, and corporations, WE NEED TO LOOK OUT FOR OURSELVES, if it means upgrading and modifying our own Mustangs, so be it. Although this is an individual decision, I felt as Registrar, that it's my responsibility to bring it to your attention; for you to make an informed choice. Just if I had heard about bad brakes, faulty engine parts, seat backs, wiring, etc...("IF" it were the case with these items).
You'll read in the CBS article that there were no standards or tests for gas tank-crashes back in the late 1960s. As a side note, read some of Iaccoca's comments about safety, and "that old Mustang".
I have this episode on tape, and have seen the Test #301. If you saw the gas (they used water) force its way into the back seat, you'd do something, too. Perhaps this video is on the net.
I also would like to know what the people that make "Tank Armor" have to say about the filler-neck-shearing-off problem and how their product protects people. Not that I doubt that it works, but you still have the filler neck there after you install their product.
Arlie's valve idea has merit. I wonder if you could remove the filler neck completely, and fill the tank like they did with the Trans-Am cars, with a cap right on top of the tank (you would have to open the trunk). BUT...that has it's own problems, with gas vapors, spillage, etc...
With all the pre-'71 Mustangs on the road, I'd think some sort of present-day retrofit could be designed. A stock-looking Mustang/Cougar fuel cell still hasn't been produced, and at a reasonable price. If something like that could be made, they'd sell thousands.
Paul N.
Paul, I previously owned two Chevrolet trucks 1976 and 1985. Same deal with the side tanks outside of the frame. Same expose by CBS?. As I recall on the Chevrolet trucks CBS was found out to have 'rigged' the outcome of the crash testing. I know that there were instances of fatalities, but CBS was unable to duplicate the outcome without a staged and rigged fuel tank crash test. This goes back before 1999 though.