• Welcome to the CaliforniaSpecial.com forums! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all our site features, please take a moment to join our community! It's fast, simple and absolutely free.

    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

    Please Note: If you are an existing member and your password no longer works, click here to reset it.

1968 Smog Tubes

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
Is this a correct smog tube for a '68 J-code (photo on left)?

My '68 C-code just had a big blue valve at the rear, but no tube (photo on right).
 

Attachments

  • Smog Tubes.jpg
    Smog Tubes.jpg
    198.2 KB · Views: 57
  • Smog Valve Rear.jpg
    Smog Valve Rear.jpg
    187.6 KB · Views: 52

J_Speegle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
488
Typically see the "tree" style on 68s and the single connection on 67 internal style systems
 
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
Oops, sorry, I forgot I owned Bob Mannel's bible.
It says 289s had the large valves and 302s had the tubes, so the setups in both photos are correct for those particular engines.
 
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
It's my understanding that all manual transmission 1968 Mustangs had them.
 

CougarCJ

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
2,216
It's my understanding that all manual transmission 1968 Mustangs had them.

Correct, all manual transmission 6 and 8 cylinder engines sold in the USA.
The air pump and related parts is called the Thermactor smog system.

Canada did not use the IMCO system either, in 1968, different air cleaners too.
 
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
Here are photos of the car with the smog tubes that I'm going to inspect Saturday morning. I took these a few days ago but didn't have time to really dig into the car. Tomorrow will be a thorough inspection and drive.

Many of you will see some huge red flags, like the taillight panel screws and the dent inside the right quarter but all in all it may not be a bad car. I'll know more tomorrow and if I don't buy it I'll post my report here for anyone who may be interested.
 

Attachments

  • 8.jpg
    8.jpg
    133.2 KB · Views: 46
  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    172.7 KB · Views: 45
  • 6.jpg
    6.jpg
    188.4 KB · Views: 48
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    198.8 KB · Views: 51
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    200.8 KB · Views: 40
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    195.1 KB · Views: 45
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    162.5 KB · Views: 44
  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    189.1 KB · Views: 47
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
A few more photos and the data tag information.

Any and all comments are certainly welcome.
 

Attachments

  • 14.jpg
    14.jpg
    106.8 KB · Views: 45
  • 13.jpg
    13.jpg
    149.4 KB · Views: 43
  • 12.jpg
    12.jpg
    158.2 KB · Views: 52
  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    192.5 KB · Views: 41
  • 10.jpg
    10.jpg
    187.9 KB · Views: 40
  • 9.jpg
    9.jpg
    158 KB · Views: 48
  • 15.jpg
    15.jpg
    195.3 KB · Views: 45

franklinair

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
4,744
Looks pretty nice to me. Floorpans & frame OK? All I noticed look like easy fixes.

Neil
 

Ruppstang

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
3,080
May be a good starting point needs a lot of little things. I thought the placement of the deluxe disc on the RH dash was odd. Looks like a lot of paint on it at least 2 repaints. Marty
 
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
From the quick glance I could take the underside looks great but I'll get the car up in the air tomorrow to make sure.

I'm a little concerned about how the taillight panel is attached. That and the dent in the quarter makes me think it was hit in the rear.

Too bad the paint looks so nice because if I buy the car (which I probably won't) it's all getting scraped off.

From what I could tell the other day I think that with a carb rebuild, a tune-up, some valve seals, some touch-up paint for the door jambs, and some brake-work this car could be a decent driver or rolling restoration for someone.

A black vinyl top without AC is a huge problem in Houston!

I'm also looking at a '67 T-code tomorrow. Gonna be a busy day!
 

speedy02

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
756
Does this person have a Marti Report?

The data plate is not in the new registry book.
 
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
Yes, I saw the Marti but don't have a copy of it yet.

The Marti shows that the car came with headrests but those are gone.

Forgot to mention that the engine is original, and it has a carb with a huge choke on it that I think is original, too.
 

CougarCJ

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
2,216
This car is sequentially in a group with several other GT/CS's.

Arlie, the shifter lever looks correct, except that it is missing the round lock out disc.
 
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
Not sure if it won't shift into reverse or if I need to be extra careful shifting into 2nd.

Edit
I found out the answer.
With that floppy Ford shifter one needs to be very careful downshifting into 2nd!!!!!
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
Took another look at the car. As usual there's good and there's bad.

The good is that it drives well, and I think the 80,000+ miles on the odometer are actual miles.

The bad is that it was definitely hit hard in the rear. Both rear frame rails are wrinkled, the steel taillight panel was replaced, and the trunk floor is a sea of wrinkles.
There is also a tiny bubble on one of the doors and the vertical area in front of the battery is rusted through.
The clear coat is also starting to peel in a few places

With the frame rails and the trunk issues my interest in this car would be to fix the easy stuff and keep this car as a J-code, 4-speed, fun to dirve driver, instead of totally restoring it.

I'm only lukewarm on the car right now so if anyone may be interested in it let me know and I'll send you a more detailed description and photos. It's about an hour from my house so running out there to look at something for you is no big deal. In fact, I purchased a fender from the guy so I need to go out there again next weekend to pick it up.

Can anyone tell if this is this the original style carb?

I'll post the Marti when I receive it (hopefully today).
 

Attachments

  • Taillight Hole Cover.jpg
    Taillight Hole Cover.jpg
    158 KB · Views: 45
  • Steering.jpg
    Steering.jpg
    164.1 KB · Views: 47
  • Rust Through.jpg
    Rust Through.jpg
    192.2 KB · Views: 41
  • Right Frame Rail.jpg
    Right Frame Rail.jpg
    153.1 KB · Views: 40
  • Left Frame Rail.jpg
    Left Frame Rail.jpg
    137 KB · Views: 42
  • Interior Quarter.jpg
    Interior Quarter.jpg
    150.3 KB · Views: 45
  • carb.jpg
    carb.jpg
    182.2 KB · Views: 52
  • 2 Aqua Cars.jpg
    2 Aqua Cars.jpg
    85.2 KB · Views: 39
  • Peeling Clear Coat.jpg
    Peeling Clear Coat.jpg
    113.7 KB · Views: 39
Last edited:

J_Speegle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
488
............The bad is that it was definitely hit hard in the rear. Both rear frame rails are wrinkled, the steel taillight panel was replaced, and the trunk floor is a sea of wrinkles.........
With the frame rails and the trunk issues my interest in this car would be to fix the easy stuff and keep this car as a J-code, 4-speed, fun to drive driver, instead of totally restoring it.


Wow - that was a pretty strong and direct hit. Seen worst but not good


Of course not completely correcting this will effect the selling of the car later if you purchased it



......Can anyone tell if this is this the original style carb?

Style - yes its a 4300. Would have to see the carb number to be sure if its the correct one for the application
 
OP
OP
Mosesatm

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
Here is the Marti
 

Attachments

  • Marti Report.jpg
    Marti Report.jpg
    125.1 KB · Views: 40
Top