The 9" rear end was NOT available as a "stand alone" option. In other words, you absolutely COULD NOT go into a Ford dealer and order say, a C-code 289 2V 1968 Mustang with a 9" rear end. If you specified that you wanted a locking differential, you could get that, whether the car had an 8" or 9" rear (I am speaking about V8 cars in this instance). Every single J-code 1968 Mustang WITH THE GT OPTION that I have ever seen (and I've seen a lot of them) had had a 9" rear end. Period. My car ('68 GT coupe, J-code, automatic) has the original rear end tag attached to it, which shows a 3.25 non-locking 9" rear. And guess what? No where on the Marti report does it indicate that it was an "option". I also checked the Marti from the '68 GT coupe I owned in the 1980s. Ditto, except that it had a 3.00 non-locking 9" which was actually an optional axle ratio that year. Notice I said RATIO. The standard axle ratio with the J-code 1968 GT was 3.25. My cousin's '68 J-code GT convertible.......3.25 non-locking 9". Nothing on the Marti report showing that a 9" axle was specified, because that was the STANDARD rear end for that car. Car I almost bought in 2006 before buying mine..........1968 GT coupe, J-code, automatic. That car had a 3.25 Equa Lock 9". It specified Equa Lock on the Marti as an option, and from the pics I have when I was looking at buying it, clearly a 9" rear end.
Everyone is entitled to his/her opinion on the subject. Mine boils down to this: With the GT option in 1968 on the J-code cars, you got a 9" axle. If the car was simply a J-code non-GT, you got an 8" rear end.
Incidentally, the door tag on the car does NOT differentiate between 8" and
9". It simply tells you what the axle ratio was, and whether it was a locking diff or not.