Welcome to the CaliforniaSpecial.com forums! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all our site features, please take a moment to join our community! It's fast, simple and absolutely free.
If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.
Please Note: If you are an existing member and your password no longer works, click here to reset it.
Arlie,
Kinda cool in a weird sort of way!! Wonder what the builder did to stiffen the unit body. These cars depend on the "C" pillar to windshield and then to firewall and shock tower braces to keep them "solid" so to speak.
That short of a roof line would require some frame stiffening in my opinion.
Well, convertibles don't have a roof line for structural strength, and the windshield pillar looks intact. In 68 Mustangs went to the dual torque boxes for added frame strength, which made them viable candidates to modify a coupe to a convertible. Although you'd have to install & weld the inner frame rail. (Don't ask me how I know.):lipsseal:
Point being- its do-able. If done right.
The verts as we know are strengthened. Just wondering what we would see if this car was raised up. As we know in stock coupe/fastback form that cutting could significantly weaken the car.
I road in a pretty rusty 1967 Mustang vert on a nice hot day. Put my arm up on the door as we were riding along. He hit a bump and "yowiee" the car flexed at the door jam and pinched the skin on my arm!!
Even a perfect vert is not a good candidate for big motors and lots of abuse. Without the top they lose a ton of structural strength. Even with the extra factory bracing. They sold them with 390's and such, but not many made the race track! For obvious reasons.