Welcome to the CaliforniaSpecial.com forums! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all our site features, please take a moment to join our community! It's fast, simple and absolutely free.
If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.
Please Note: If you are an existing member and your password no longer works, click here to reset it.
Some times just the way the ad is written gives me enough red flags to not call! Not to mention no engine pictures, undercage pictures interior pictures, trunk pictures or Marti report. 28K?
I appreciate your interest in our car, but Ford must have used the K code designation on some of the 68 cars including this California Special. It is a K code car and we also have the Marti report verifying the designation and the 289 hi-po engine. I don't know how many 68's carry the K code designation or the 289 engine, but this car is definately one of them. Thanks again for your email concerning our car.
He said he had one that states its a K code, yeah right. I finally asked for a copy, no response yet. I also backed up some information on the engine choices for 68 and K was not one of them
Hmmm... a K code with a C. Is that kind of like crab with a K?
And rear shackles are probably still better then what I did to my first car as a 16 year old kid; air shocks!!! No better way to rip right through the floor of your Mustang then to pump those babies up to 100 psi and hit a speed bump at speed.