• Welcome to the CaliforniaSpecial.com forums! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all our site features, please take a moment to join our community! It's fast, simple and absolutely free.

    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

    Please Note: If you are an existing member and your password no longer works, click here to reset it.

Gas Mileage: Who's CS drinks fuel the quickest/slowest?

p51

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
1,025
Location
NorCal
Quote:
Originally Posted by robert campbell
Racing fuel could make a huge difference if you tune the car to it, and then use it consistently. Octane booster could have the same effect to a lesser degree.

The key word is consistently. A perfectly tuned to 92 octane 10 to 1 compression motor would ping all over itself on racing fuel. Racing fuel is much more volatile, explodes more quickly, and produces much more “power per given explosion” in the cylinder. You would need to retard your timing, recurve your distributor, and maybe rejet on the carb.
Rob



I dont know if you consider 100 octane VP gasoline as "racing fuel." I know i do, but i never have had a problem pinging with the 100 octane VP fuel with my car dyno tuned to CA 91 octane from the pump. I always race with the 100 octane VP fuel at the track, especially now for the Nitrous. I can't even run the nitrous on the 91 from the pump is what im told. I would tune the car to the 100 octane gas for the track, but then once i'm done racing, i have to put 91 in it to make it home because i dont trailer the car yet and then it would ping on me. So, i get the car tuned for 91 and then put 100 octane in it to be safe at the track, to make a little more power, and so i can safely run my Nitrous. Even though the car isnt tuned for 100, it feels stronger with the 100 on a CA 91 tune, but im sure i don't reap all the benefits as if i had it tuned on the 100, but i've never experienced pinging with a higher octane fuel than what the car is tuned for.


Yep, David, that's consistent w/my understanding if "racing fuel" = higher octane. As the octane rating increases the tendency for the fuel to detonate from the heat of compression (before the spark plug fires) reduces. In that sense higher octane is less volatile. So for high compression engines low octane fuel causes pinging. For lower compression engines using higher octane is just a waste of money. There is no more energy/gal in higher octane fuel.

BTW: For those of us living in CA where the highest octane is 91 (which is marginal on a 10:1 compression engine) there are some (only a few) Union 76 stations that do sell high octane gas. Two in the south bay area as far as I know. The racing fuels that 76 produces are...
http://www.ggoil.com/racing.htm

Otherwise if you use 91 octane gas you end up having to tune the engine away from its optimal operating point by retarding(?) the spark a bit. But this retarding of the spark means less performance and poorer gas mileage as it is not optimal for the design of the engine (someone please correct me if I'm off base with any of this). But it stops the pinging with the low octane gas.

James
 

Scott

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
126
Location
Coogee Beach, Sydney, Australia
I think you're "on point" with pinging etc James... hence the benefits of electronic ignition and higher powered systems.

Just read an article in MCR this morning by Brad Ocock about buying a Duster in LA and driving 2574 miles back along route 66. It was the slant six but had a 40 degree error on the distributor shaft 'fixed' by swapping the leads around until it ran! He made it all the way like that (with a bit of fun along the way of course). What a vote for the durability of the block to even survive trying to blow itself apart like that!
 

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
After driving to Steve's house and back for 140 miles, and driving to and from work on side streets for 80 miles, I averaged 20mpg with a J-code, 5-speed, and 3.25 gears.

Can't wait to see what kind of mileage I get on the open road without all that city driving. At 70mph I'm turning only 1800rpm in 5th gear.
 

Ruppstang

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
3,080
After driving to Steve's house and back for 140 miles, and driving to and from work on side streets for 80 miles, I averaged 20mpg with a J-code, 5-speed, and 3.25 gears.

Can't wait to see what kind of mileage I get on the open road without all that city driving. At 70mph I'm turning only 1800rpm in 5th gear.

Wow that is great! I'll put that one on my list when I build a modified car. I know Rob will be there to help with more ideas.
Marty
 

robert campbell

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
4,322
Marty,
I drove this car and the T-5, 5 speed is a perfect match for the gears and is very responsive and the gear spacing is perfect going up a freeway on-ramp. Arlie was able to use the factory Z-bar as I remember.

Easy conversion and a must for any stock or mild built small block Mustang that will be cruised on the freeway IMO. And the exhaust sound from this car made me think of Bullit!! And Arlie is considering quieting it down.... NOT ME!!!

Rob
 

Mosesatm

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
9,178
I drove it to Yakima and back today for its first real road/shakedown trip.

Discovered a couple problems that need to be addressed but what I was worried about was turning so few revs in 5th gear going up hills. With 300 torques it was no problem at all, even when I got stuck behind a truck and the car was at around 1200rpm it pulled strong without shifting.

It was annoying when the PS pump spit up, and the shoulder harness fell off, but those things are easy to fix.

In all my years of driving Mustangs I'd never had a shoulder belt unscrew from the roof mount and fall off, until today. Talk about a WTH moment!
It's always something different with these cars!
 

Attachments

  • image1.jpg.jpeg
    image1.jpg.jpeg
    141.9 KB · Views: 30

mbsf1970

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
795
Location
Calgary Alberta
ran about 5000 miles on Doug (289) last summer and he averaged about 19-21 MPG at 70 mph or so. I was pleased I think?!!

Stephen
 

BroadwayBlue

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Messages
2,900
Location
Hudson Valley Area, NY
I've been keeping track of my MPGs on the CS for the past 7 years.

Overall I'm averaging 16.2

On some long highway trips to Carlise, PA or Lake George, NY (4 and 3 hours trips) I have done 20-22 MPG

Around town I've done as low as 8-10 MPG. Maybe I had my lead boots on those days :grin:
 

robert campbell

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
4,322
Best I got with Val's Fastback is 8 miles to the gallon!! Driving VERY conservative. I have changed the idle jets and zeroed in a lot better on the float level in the Webers now. Maybe I could crack 10 miles per gallon!!!
 

p51

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
1,025
Location
NorCal
A number of years back I checked and was getting just a tad over 20mpg with a 302 J-code stock engine, T-5 transmission, 3.4 differential, and a carb. This was almost all highway driving and driving conservatively (I was trying to see what the very best mpg was). I never measured it on a long trip but with efi "round town" mpg was boosted by ~15%. So, that should equate to ~23mpg (again, for conservative highway driving only, meaning a number you will never exceed). Interestingly, this is pretty much what a circa 1990 fox body 5.0 mustang would get for highway driving...

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/1990_Ford_Mustang.shtml
 
Top